I'm in the midst of searching for a job; something I hadn't intended on writing about here this time around.  Last time I was RIF'd I spent a lot of time writing about different aspects of the career tool kit and having fun with it, and learning a lot (and sharing that with other job seekers).  Been there, done that.  But I've noticed a disturbing trend this time around.

The last time the tools liked Linkedin were not yet fully embraced by the majority of jobseekers; times have changed.  Now social media has been fully embraced; even Twitter and Facebook are being utilized to source candidates.  It's easier to find opportunities, especially with sites like Indeed.  But with it there are even more hurdles for jobseekers with talent management tools and resume scanners being commonplace.

Unsurprisingly, there are a lot of long term unemployed out there, but more surprisingly is how vehemently some people are while expressing their negativity.  I'm astounded by the bitterness I see in forums on Indeed; it seems many people are quick to tell the world just how much they hate recruiters and the whole hiring process.  A lot of the frequent commenters are also quick to blame the process and those representing the employers (recruiters, HR partners, and hiring managers alike).

One forum participant said, "One call, if that and I am done. Sniveling and groveling should not be a job requirement."  Another said, "why wasn't I hired on the spot during the interview ? I had all the right credentials."  Yet another muttered, "If they don't call, move on." Then one proclaimed, "Don't ask open ended BS questions that will generate BS responses. It doesn't matter. I'm excreting in the wind here anyway."

Manners aside, who would want to hire someone who showed so much disdain and disinterest, let alone a lack of understanding of the hiring process? That's not someone I want to work with.  Don't get me wrong, I'm hardly a Pollyanna, and shiny happy people get on my nerves.  Not every day at work is doing to be a great, fun day.  But if you don't show any passion for the job or interest in the company, all you're doing is eliminating yourself from the candidate pool.

Even when I didn't like particular situations, I've liked the work I do.  So much so that shortly after my last job ended, I was talking to someone at a networking event and after she prompted me to talk what I've been doing, she quipped, "you're face lights up when you talk about it."  I like to think that's evident when I'm talking with recruiters and hiring managers.  Because I do love what I do, especially when I can clearly see how it helps other people do their job.  And I know that's something people in the hiring process can appreciate.

That's not saying there isn't callousness and misrepresentations on the hiring side.  It's a little rude when you can't even send an automated email saying thanks but no thanks. And sometimes the HR partner or recruiter who's doing the screening interview doesn't give much opportunity to have an actual conversation they're so focused on asking the required question and parroting the basic company information.

But even so, self-limitation isn't going to land any jobseeker a job.  It's important to take an honest look at all the barriers you throw in your own path, and find ways to remove them. Blamethrowing has no place in job search, and if you think otherwise the only person you're fooling is yourself.

The first lesson I took to heart about job searching was when my step-brother was telling the family about landing his dream job.  He considered working for a particular organization as the ultimate goal in his career, so when a position opened up there, he applied, and was interviewed.  And then he heard nothing.  Finally he called the hiring manager.  Imagine his surprise when he was told that he was their top pick but they were about to offer someone else the job since he hadn't followed up, and never clearly said, "I want this job."

Looking for a new position -- whatever the reason -- is not a passive process.  Employers are not going to go out of their way to hire you; they're only desperate for hard to find skillsets (like android software developers, which if you are, you're far too busy to read this because you've got work lined up for years).  If you have to apply for the job then you're competing for it, and when you're not the only candidate for the job, you need to find ways to differentiate yourself from the crowd.  To make recruiters and employers want to pursue you, you have to stop giving them reasons to reject you.

Even charities don't give money away to just anyone, let alone a for-profit business. All things being equal -- including the experience and skillsets -- the candidate they're going to hire is the one they can relate to, and can see fitting in to their organization. That's going to be the positive, proactive, and courteous candidate.  

After all, who wants to work with Debbie Downer?

[Photo: When will this be over? by Lig Ynnek.  Some rights reserved via Creative Commons.]

I was looking over some of my LinkedIn groups this week, and on a Instructional Designer group the question of the how to increase post training evaluation participation (as well as their value) was being discussed.  I happen to be a big proponent of post-training evaluations, both as learner and someone who has developed and delivered training, so of course I chimed in.

This past week I was on the other side of the room as a learner for some appallingly bad classroom training.  It was voluntary, but I was hoping to fill in some gaps and get inspired.  But the only way I stayed awake was taking notes on the ways it was failing the learners, from the cumbersome, obtuse handouts to the dangerously outdated advice (anyone telling other people they are "powerless" galls me, let alone a professional trainer). Unsurprisingly there was no mention on how to provide feedback mentioned in any of the classes.
 
It made me think back to when I first developed and delivered training in a formal environment.  I was doing outsourced technical support over the phone at a call center where all training was peer training.  Being an outsourced helpdesk meant we not only had to be good at what we did, but prove we were doing it well -- as outlined in the procedures as agreed between our company and the client company.  Every account was different, save one thing; failing to meet Service Level Agreements risked financial penalty and potentially breaking the contract.  So problems with dropped calls and low customer satisfaction were business critical. 

After I'd been there a while I was asked to run some remedial training on Customer Service and Phone Procedures. I sweated over a course outline and the accompanying handout that had clear instructions on all the requisite steps to transfer, conference, and park a call (which creates a virtual extension). I put a lot of thought into how to present the fundamentals of customer service as it applied to over-the-phone tech support. The first course went well and I ended up being the designated trainer for the regular course. 

At the end of every course it was required that the learners complete an evaluation, and usually I had only high marks.  But after a while I found out there were some comments in evaluations that the training was boring.  It's no surprise, it's pretty dry stuff.  But I took that as a challenge, and it was my first lightbulb moment as an instructional designer. I knew the objectives and the material inside and out, but I hadn't worked in interactions that transformed it from abstract to practical.  

So I overhauled the course to simulate a favorite tech support scenario – the smoking monitor.  This was back in the day of CRT monitors being the norm, and I can say from personal experience it's more than a little disconcerting to see a plume of acrid white smoke appearing above the monitor. Imagine how disconcerting for someone who was required to call a toll free number to get help; it's not so hard to imagine the caller's impatience with a fumbling or flippant helpdesk agent.

A quick introduction started with simple math (Unmet SLAs = Lost Clients = Lost Jobs), the first few times delivered while holding a prop whip (it is Texas after all, and it played well).  After covering some basics of phone etiquette and customer service.  I let them know to get their procedures helpfile open and be ready, we were going to take calls.  I started the simulation by picking up the phone by me and calling the extension by one of the learners.  He or she became a helpdesk agent, having to follow the procedure in the helpfile, deal with a frantic caller, then transfer the call. 

Everyone experienced being on both sides of the call; they were the helpdesk agent, and then the end user;  they also had to transfer, park, and conference the call so they had hands on experience working with the phone when they had a caller on the line. I guided them through common scenarios from actual complaints to demonstrating just how long 30 seconds of silence can be on the phone. We'd explore other scenarios such as diplomatically telling a caller not only can't he install shareware on his computer, but we can't send a field tech to do it either, or when we would forward such a request (when our contact center system indicated he was a VIP). 

The class was transformed; people were leaning forward in their seats, actively participating, even laughing at some of the antics of their peers.  During one particularly rambunctious class, a manager asked us to quiet down (darn those thin walls and that conference call).  There was no doubt it became an active learning experience.

Simply being told "follow the procedures" and "don't be flippant" won't help anyone learn, especially helpdesk agents, many of whom had attitudes and ambitions that exceeded their experience.  It transformed from the abstract to the practical, while being a lot of fun.  And more importantly, once these agents were out on the floor, fewer calls were dropped, and customer satisfaction improved. And we didn't even have to bring out the whip.

[Photo:  10' Morgan Blacksnake by AldoZL. Used courtesy Creative Commons.]

My Blackberry is dying. It keeps throwing errors and requiring a battery pull to function; my research shows that similar errors indicate software or general phone failure.  So I've been looking into getting a new smart phone.

And Blackberry is really pushing me to abandon their product line.

It's not just because the phone is dying, and it's not doubt in the company's future after all the issues it's had in the last year alone.  The final straw is their inexplicable resistance to help in reporting issues with their own website.

I was looking at new models and didn't see ones I liked available through my mobile carrier, so I looked at the Blackberry website.  I found a phone I was particularly interested in, so being a good little consumer, I put in the closest match to my carrier and selected the model.  But the page that came up for that vendor was not the product I wanted, in fact, it wasn't even a "this product is not currently available" page.  It was a competitor's phone, not even a Blackberry.

So I went looking for a way to report website issues at the Blackberry site, but the section that says "Website feedback" and "Report web site bugs or send feedback regarding BlackBerry.com" and launches an email link sends me back an obtuse auto-reply that not only does not address website feedback, but says "Action Required" and "the email you submitted has not been delivered."

Really Blackberry?  Are you that interested in alienating your customer base?  I know you're focusing on enterprise sales and not consumers, but come on.  I went through all the trouble of sending you the page with the problem and the URL for the bait and switch page, and you don't care?  It's not that difficult, even if you're trying to avoid spam and other web nastiness. I don't think Blackberry cares about me as a customer, and I suspect I'm not the only individual -- or company -- that feels that way.

I'm sure the folks behind Android are thanking RIM.  

The most annoyingly untrue tenet of business is the adage that "the customer is always right." 

They're not. And embracing that adage can mean failing your customer as well as yourself. What is true is that the customer always has needs.

The best vendors understand that and are willing to say no when it's warranted. Usually in more than one syllable and in a way that benefits your business, but ultimately they excel by helping to understand the root need, and find the best way to meet ... << MORE >>

You might have noticed in the last year or two I've been terrible about consistently updating this blog. Lots of plans to do that, but then real life, and more precisely real work keep taking up most of my time. So for the rest of the month I plan on a daily update.

I've also cleaned up the overall template and sidebar for the blog. While I feel a bit guilty for not maintaining the blog I feel ... << MORE >>

They're clearly useful as a marketing tool, but imagine how you could use them in your business. You could place QR codes in strategic locations to help your employees access useful information on demand, such as where to access emergency procedures. You can include them with hard copies of materials, to locate the source (both who's responsible for the document and even the intranet location of the document). Simple information that can be cumbersome to access such as contact info and those pesky, long URLs from your intranet can be embedded in a QR code.

Adopting QR codes into your environment does have some drawbacks that need to be explored before you use them.  There are currently 40 QR code versions, not all code generators are equal. Some versions have better error correction than others, which is why sometimes you just can't get a good scan on your QR app on your smartphone. PWB Marketing starts the conversation about QR codes you should be having in their blog post, QR Codes: Is Your QR Code Secure.

Security is no small concern with QR codes; anything you put out on the internet is at risk, and once it's out there, the ways of abusing it are only limited by the imagination. It takes data to generate the code which means that data has been exposed to the code generating site. Not all QR generators are equal, and some not only store your data, but can redirect the QR code to other sites; malware, anyone? That intranet URL you embedded can be misused, so due diligence is in order. SBA-Research has an PDF abstract on QR Code Security that your IT people should read before you go QR crazy.

Smartphone use in your work environment is another issue; not everyone has a company provided phone. Getting the QR requires taking a picture; you could be violating company policy by using personal phones to take the pictures.

So as much as I like QR codes -- and I do -- while I think they have great potential, there are also serious risks before adopting them.

[Photo:  :Cue Cat by Si1very. Some rights reserved under Creative Commons.]

"Solving business problems."  That's how a friend of Lavacon's Jack Molisani describes her work.  That's what a tech writer does. But what does that really mean?

If you look at job postings, technical writing related jobs have so many job titles it's more ambiguous than describing someone as a business analyst.  In fact, several postings I've read in the last few months use the term "analyst."  Some postings are actually describing programmers, some instructional designers, content developers, documentation specialists, the list goes on. But it all boils down to the "solving business problems" analogy.  

My latest full-time position was "training manager," and before that I was a "learning coordinator."  Essentially, I was an instructional designer who both developed online training and managed that training.  But in my mind, I was still a technical writer.  Instead of developing work instructions, I was translating them into interactive, online learning.  And instead of developing and maintaining knowledgebases for a help desk, I was creating an internal knowledgebase on the authoring tools and technical issues surrounding online learning.  

The concepts are the same, even if the delivery is slightly different.  Information needs to be communicated and accessible, and it needs to be developed in a manner that the users -- or learners -- find accessible. That can change depending on so many factors and not just familiarity with the topic.  And one-size does not fit all; no solution will work for every organization or even every group in an organization, even in the same location.

Those problems that occur, are always solved through communication, whether it's instructor led training, self paced learning, or having materials with useful content that is available and easily accessible on demand.

I'm a tech writer. It's what I do; but there are times when I'm a bit uncomfortable with calling myself a "technical writer." The term is often associated with writing manuals for high tech products that are very high level and often useless. Or worse, a "documentation specialist." That sounds about as dramatic as a tax manual and equally cumbersome.

Those are the opposite of what a good technical writer is.

I'm neither a fan of arcane writing any more than I enjoy reading a tome when all I want to do is learn what I need to in order to get on with more important things. I know I'm not alone in that.
One of my light bulb moments was hearing Maya Angelou apologize for the length of an Inaugural Poem being too long, and that if she had more time, it would have been shorter. Content -- what often gets called "documentation" -- shouldn't be epic, whether it's a complete guide on how to use software or a business process. I often spend a lot more time re-shaping what I've written than I do the first draft. It's not that I find writing hard, it's that I want to make sure whatever I'm working on is not just informative, but user friendly. Not just for others, but for me.

It's essential to balance information with usefulness -- and usability. I usually know a lot more about a subject than ends up in my work. But I'm also equally focused on making sure it's presented in an easily accessible way that helps the intended reader get the information they need quickly and easily, and re-find it when they need to.

At Lavacon 2011, I was pleasantly surprised to hear so many other "tech writers" not only stress the importance of clear communication, but on the importance of content that has impact. Lavacon's Jack Molisani mentioned that one particular friend who's a tech writer describes what she does as "solving business problems."  That's probably the most accurate way of describing what I do.

As I write this, Texas is afire all around me. My immediate area seems safe. For now.  As far as I know. That’s not a very comforting thought. 

By early evening there were about three dozen fires in central Texas according to a Weather Underground map (I counted them in an earlier version of this map).  There have been road closures, thousands of people have been evacuated, hundreds of homes destroyed, and at least 14,000 acres in Bastrop county alone have burned in just one fire.  The Steiner Ranch subdivision has been shut down, and it's not all that far from where I live. 

There’s been a disturbing lack of timely official information; I wish I had noted the time I first became aware of the fires to create an accurate timeline about the disconnect between media updates and official news. The more I looked tonight for official news for local, regional and state emergency information, the more I realized that there is a plethora of information about preparedness, awareness (and planning and appointments) but almost nothing about action. After Katrina and the September 11 attacks one would think there would be an official state site Texans that would provide official links to emergency management agencies and where to look for information in case of emergencies, especially when they cross municipal and county boundaries.  It’s not like Texas has never seen a natural disaster before; we've seen drought before and the wildfires that come with it, and neither fires nor tornados or hurricanes don’t follow government boundaries.

But the state agency charged with “emergency management services,” the Texas Department of Public Safety doesn’t have any page that I can find that directs the public to official information on active emergencies.  Instead tonight on the @TxDPS twitter account that agency commented on the wildfire situation stating "be aware of what's happening in your area. Monitor local media. If evacuations ordered, get out!"

Local media outlets are not created equal, and they need the official information in order to share it with the public.  If I hadn't been aware of these fires through twitter, I still wouldn't know about the central Texas wildfires (#centraltxfires on twitter).  This is precisely when leadership is needed, and little of it has been visible this weekend.  Emergencies do not occur in a vacuum, real people and their property are in harms way and if the official agencies cannot provide information when people need it, people will not only look elsewhere they will do what they can to take action on their own . It’s a lose-lose scenario unless local officials step up, whether it’s a holiday weekend or not.

The Bastrop County Emergency Management webpage has a simple, sparse  page, but includes it’s twitter account @BastropCntyOEM on that page, and they actively use the account, especially today.  It took until 8:30pm for the Austin/Travis County Emergency Operation Center page to say the EOC was "partially activated", and it wasn’t until 9:07pm that it had any information about the Steiner Ranch evacuation, which was found under News and Info > Latest News until some time after 10:30pm Sunday.  The updates occured around the same time as the twitter updates to @austintexasgov. It is still not listed under “Incident Updates” a page which hasn’t been updated since a bee swarm in May, although it’s now clearly visible on the home page.  According to the 2010 Census summary for Texas, there are 1,024,266 people in Travis County.  Bastrop county has only 74,171 people, and doesn't include the state capital.  The math doesn’t add up.  

In fairness, there is an Austin Fire Department Active Incident page that is updated every three minutes. But that isn't accessible through the Austin HSEM page, and it only includes City of Austin fire and hazmat incidents. And I have to commend Austin American Statesman and KXAN News seemed to be doing the best job of tracking fires, evacuations, and road closures, but they haven’t had much information to go on. I hope they both do in-depth follow-ups on the lack of information available to Austin and Travis county today, and take Austin and the HSEM office to task for dropping the ball.

It’s heartbreaking to see tweets from people desperate for information about their homes.  I found out about the Steiner Ranch fire through twitter, when one of its residents who is out of town replied to a tweet of mine that included a link to the original Statesman blotter blog about multiple fires.  This man is out of town, his home is probably gone, and he’d been trying desperately to get information all afternoon.  He should not have to beg for information on twitter. 

Between the record obliterating heat we've had this year, and being in an exceptional drought with no end in sight, wildfires are likely to continue being epidemic. According to a Texas Forest Service Incident Management Situation Report from Friday indicates well over two million acres have burned in Texas this year, and that report hasn't been updated in two days. So it's great that Texas Prepares, but it would be better if Texas Responded. I’m prepared for a “shelter-in-place” emergency, I’m not prepared for an evacuation, and I’m not confident that Austin or Texas is doing an adequate job in keeping the public informed when emergencies occur.

All these fires are not going to be contained overnight, and more are likely to start tomorrow, especially considering the number of people who are likely to be outside cooking (and smoking). So please be extra careful.  And here are useful twitter links to staying on top of the news, and are available on the @JennBrownFilm/centraltxfires:

• #centraltxfires for news and comments about the Central Texas Fires
• @CenTexRedCross for Red Cross, including their "Safe and well" checkins/notifications
• @austintexasgov Apparently any emergency service updates come from here for Austin
• @BastropCntyOEM Bastrop County's emergency service updates
• @TxDPS Official TX Department of Public Safety account - not very useful
• @Statesman  Austin American Statesman Blotter Blog - first available info
• @KXAN_News Very detailed info by neighborhoods
• @KUTNews
• @AustinPetsAlive is taking in some of the displaced Bastrop shelter animals

[As these fires are not all under control, the stats related to them are likely to change.]

Remember the film, The Blind Side, the one that earned Sandra Bullock many accolades and an Oscar?  The man whose story inspired the film, Michael Oher, has written a book (with the help of Don Yaegar) to set his story straight called I Beat the Odds: From Homelessness, to The Blind Side, and Beyond.  It’s a provocative and interesting read, a reminder about not just the importance of support, but a how-to book for those kids in similar circumstances who want to better themselves, and those who want to help them. 

Stories like The Blind Side make many uncomfortable because it’s another poor brown kid makes good only with the help of rich white intervention compounded by a legitimate issue with leniency towards athletes.   If you remember the film, Oher had a tutor help him meet NCAA academic eligibility; what’s not included in the film is the fact he took some online courses to replace some of his earlier academic failures, which has been a source of controversy, and a sorepoint for Oher.  But summing up the story of Oher and Touhys in a tweet-length soundbite is as grossly misrepresentative as assuming Oher skated by academically because of nepotism and exploitation.  It’s a lot like the hot coffee lawsuit story; reduced to snarky snippets, a story reads one way, when in fact the whole story is completely different.

Oher never lacked ambition to improve himself, only in practical skills and examples to follow, along with the support and security vital to achieving his goals.  Once he had those, and didn’t have to worry about keeping a roof over his head or where he’d get his next meal, he flourished.  Detractors who cry foul at the fact he was able to make up for past academic failures are missing the point; penalizing anyone instead of rewarding them for all their hardwork not only hurts them, but anyone else who aspires to better themselves.  If no one can escape their past mistakes -- especially ones made by a child whose essentially had no real life role models until he was a teenager, then no one can, and that's just wrong.

Shortly after I started middle school, my social studies teacher declared in class (apropos to nothing) that children whose parents divorce were “damaged goods” and going to be criminals and worse, prone to mental illness and suicide.  I was shocked and highly offended that this man whose job was to shape the minds of children so brazenly condemned so many of us for something beyond our control.  In his eyes, I might as well not bother aspiring to anything.  More than 30 years later, I remember can recall that moment vividly.  Even though I was never in the foster-care system, I can relate to Oher’s background (more than I’m comfortable in admitting), and being so callously dismissed at such a young age has stayed with me.  I would never presume to know exactly what Oher has overcome, but knowing how hard it is not to internalize the words and actions of the adults around you as a child, makes me appreciate his achievements, and just how important it is for a child to have positive reinforcement. 

The old saying that a burden shared is a burden lessened is epitomized by Oher;  once he was secure in knowing he had people like the Touhys (and many others before and after), his burdens were lessened, and obstacles to success were removed.  Yes, he had a private tutor, and yes, he was allowed to replace some of his early high school record. And why shouldn't he?  He wasn't given anything he hadn't earned.

The most important part of his story, in his own words, is that his life was not just blessed with talent “but people who were willing to help [him] develop that talent into something great.”  When all the rhetoric is removed, it boils down to whether or not someone’s extraordinary efforts to improve oneself matters.  What should really matter is just how far Oher has come, and those extraordinary efforts – tutor and replacement classes or no – are nothing less than extraordinary. 

It may sound like the biggest cliche ever, but it's a truism for a reason.

Getting nominated for a film award (in most cases) your film or performance or screenplay is truly being recognized as outstanding. But when it comes to the final votes, there truly can be only one, and that's where ugly things like politics comes in. The reasons vary as greatly as the films.

Sometimes it's particularly lame politics, like studios and distributors not sending out screener discs or showing films to the press, or ... << MORE >>

I really, really cannot stand over-marketing. You know what I mean, a decent seeming company whose products and services you otherwise respect but they just don't know that the hard sell can often lead to no-sell, especially when it comes to social media? Worse, when current events and trends cause them to spam you with tweets, emails, and status updates? It drives me crazy, and I've even stopped doing business with companies that overdo their communications, even NPOs I otherwise support. 

Wednesday those of us in Texas got a very unwelcome introduction into unannounced emergency rolling blackouts due in part to the recent cold snap. We don't get a lot of freezing weather here and apparently the infrastructure for electric heating, coupled with high winds downing trees and power lines meant we had rolling blackouts from very early morning until mid afternoon.  To say the outages were an inconvenience is an understatement. We didn't have rolling black-outs over the very long and hot summer, so it took a lot of people by surprise.

Flash forward to this afternoon. I got an email from a company that seems to have mastered the soft-sell. OnRamp  is a data center services company, specializing in disaster recovery, managed hosting, and colocation. All that means that if something happens at your office or to your servers, your data is safe. The type of services that OnRamp offers is not cheap, but neither are the consequences of not having disaster recovery.

OnRamp used to have happy hours a few times a year that were very popular with the tech and recruiting crowd. I don't know how many companies they pulled in as customers, but I appreciated the soft sell approach. And today, an email from their CEO reminded me why I like their appearance, even if I'm not in a position to hire them.

This low-key email written in a casually professional tone is very clever. Here's the opening paragraph:

"I think we were all put to the test this week in Texas by the storm that’s now being billed as the worst storm in decades. Whether the power was out at your home or office, you got stuck at a blinking light or your flight was delayed, chances are you were one of the thousands affected by the emergency rolling blackouts. One of our employees was visiting a customer when the power went out in their office building forcing their employees to go home. This storm got us thinking: what would you do if the power was out for hours or even days? Can you afford to be one of those companies?"

It then goes on to mention specifically how OnRamp can help, then a reminder that they experience a "surge in calls" after an emergency, and how such events should be wake up calls.

Clearly, this email from OnRamp was a sales pitch leveraging recent events. It doesn't feel opportunist, it feels like good advice. It's not at all a hard sell, because they don't bombard me with emails all the time just because I'm on their mailing list.  The entire email is written concisely enough that it would be perfect to forward on to executive management who need to make decisions about disaster recovery and data protection.

I wish other companies followed a similar marketing strategy.

Everyone has resolutions for the New Year. I have a double-incentive.  My birthday is just over two weeks after the New Year, so my incentives to make change are a bit more intense.  One of my resolutions is a series of “micro-workouts” throughout the day. In fact all my resolutions are small ones, but this is the big little one.  Let me explain.

I work from home, and with a flexible schedule day job, and a moonlighting gig that makes my schedule erratic, and in the last few months, very intense and making my poor sleeping habits turn into full blown insomnia. And exercise has been almost non-existent, even with some equipment at home.

Don’t get me wrong I love my jobs. But working from home I don’t get the mad dashes to catch buses as a mass-transit commuter that I used to.  And while Capital Metro’s schizoid schedules and oddly missing areas of service, I still don’t get the same amount of walking as I used to. Add in the fact the great gym that was a 15 minute walk from home closed leaving my only option an exhibitionist gym in the area, options haven’t been great.

So hearing news that working out all in one shot is not the best way to work out, I decided to start doing 3-5 minute workouts at least once an hour, 8-10 times a day.  I’ve been rotating between a series of resistance stretches with this “pilates rower exerciser” and a mile at a time on my stationary bike, and occasionally on a rowing machine (bad knees means I don’t use that as much). I have a pedometer so if I couldn’t get the 8-10 “cycles” in, I could substitute 1,000 paces for 1 “cycle.”  I’ve only had to do that twice since starting.

The great thing is, I’m easily doing 10 cycles a day, and finding if work allows, I’m taking an exercise break more frequently. The “pilates exerciser” cycle has more reps and more things mixed in.  I haven’t dropped a lot of weight, but I’m already noticing a small change in how some clothes fit, as well as a major upswing in my daytime energy, and an improvement in my mood (both of which couldn’t get much lower). 
I do find I feel a need to walk around immediately after a session, which is good for obvious reaso
ns.  The downside is it’s Cedar Fever Season. After 13 years in Austin, last year I started getting the symptoms. This year, it’s bad enough I practically have to invoke HazMat protocols (you think I’m kidding how bad it is, take a look at this anti-cedar site).  It’s miserable stuff, so long walks outside are being avoided until February. 

I’m not saying that it’s been a panacea, but I have to say, it’s really helped me, personally.  Like many Americans, I need to get in better physical shape and I have a couple of other issues.  And when either willpower, attention, and time are an issue, it’s really hard to make excuses not to.

Like millions of Americans, I keep thinking "I need to eat better."  And like 999,999,100 of them, I often end up failing miserably, Although you won't catch me eating at McDonald's, I do resort to take out more than I should.

But lucky, lucky me. One of my take out options these days is The Soup Peddler , a variation of an Austin classic food option started by a guy on a bike delivering soup to his friends. It grew to a a bigger delivery service, and as of a couple of months ...

<< MORE >>

Oh, blog, how I’ve neglected you.  It's been too many months since my last... That’s what happens when one has more things to do than time to do it.  One of my resolutions this year is to try to update here once a month.

One of my friends asked me to look over an endorsement he was writing today.  He wanted an objective opinion to make sure it was good enough to help the person he was endorsing on a business site, without being too flowery or personal.

He nailed it; it enough detail to demonstrate why he thinks someone should use this person’s services, without drowning it.  He was very positive, because he believes in this person, and it was clearly a personal endorsement.  At the same time, he didn’t diffuse his endorsement in excess – which means it’s unlikely to get lost in a sea of empty endorsements.

With all the resolutions people make at this time of the year, perhaps you might want to add one about sharing your good opinion of someone you work with.  Who knows, maybe it will help them remember to return the favor.